FIRST, OUR ESSAY:      
FastDomain Website Hosting


WE NEED YOUR HELP! Perhaps you've read this before and are wondering, "Why am I seeing this again?" But millions of other Christians haven't seen it! So please use the "share" buttons above to share it with your social media friends. Thanks!!

SEEK THE WELFARE OF THE CITY, PART 2

seek the welfare 2In case you're thinking "That was then, but this is now!" about Jeremiah 29:7 – "Seek the welfare of the city" – well, you're in for a surprise. It explains in Part 1 that there were beggars who refused to work, so Christian philanthropists were warned not to simply give them money: "Here we clearly see the goal of the social ministry of the Church: 'The role of social work is to make the recipient aware of the need to change' – unless the poor or disabled person makes a commitment to change, our efforts to help may be in vain." Human nature hasn't changed much in the past 2,000 years!

On our "Homes and Jobs" page, go to the link: "Get Your Life on Track." You'll see several Scriptures illustrating the lifestyle that Christians should have. At the bottom of that section is another link: "Do you want to be restored to wholeness?" which takes you to our Problem Assessment: Physical and Spiritual Rehabilitation Plan that we can fill out with our disabled or unemployed clients. Midway through the form, after gathering the client's work and health history, are the following words:

I want to be restored to wholeness, and therefore I am ready to change my lifestyle.
Signature: I, _________________, agree to follow the plan.

The client must be willing to change his/her mindset and lifestyle. Here is what the Apostle Paul wrote in 2 Thessalonians, chapter 3 about this:

"6 Now we command you, brothers, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you withdraw yourselves from every brother living in idleness, and not after the tradition which they received from us. 7 For you know how you ought to imitate us. For we were not idle among you, 8 neither did we eat bread from anyone's hand without paying for it, but in labor and travail worked night and day, that we might not burden any of you; 9 not because we don't have the right, but to make ourselves an example to you, that you should imitate us. 10 For even when we were with you, we commanded you this: 'If anyone is not willing to work, neither let him eat.' 11 For we hear of some who among you walk in idleness, who don't work at all, but are busybodies. 12 Now those who are that way, we command and exhort in the Lord Jesus Christ, that with quietness they work, and earn their own living. 13 But you, brothers, don't be weary in doing good. 14 If any man doesn't obey our word in this letter, note that man, that you have no fellowship with him, to the end that he may be ashamed. 15 Don't count him as an enemy, but admonish him as a brother."

What did the Early Church Fathers have to say about the above Scripture passage? –

"Paul strongly emphasizes, in strict words of command, the importance of labor, especially manual labor, as an accompaniment to prayer and fasting. These religious acts must never substitute for hard work (Chrysostom, Augustine). Prayer without work is a pious pretext (Cyril of Alexandria). There is no inconsistency between trusting God to provide and engaging in hard work in order to support ourselves and not be a burden on others (Augustine, Caesarius of Arles). Faithful and hardworking members of the congregation must be careful to make a sharp separation between themselves and those brothers and sisters who are living in a disorderly way (John Cassian, Theodore). Paul holds himself up as "the form of a believer," expecting the Thessalonians to see in him how one ought to live (Chrysostom, Pelagius). In our pursuit of faithful discipleship we are to avoid the controversy that arises from idle questioning and curiosity (Basil). Christian brothers and sisters who depart from the discipline and charity required by faith are to be directly confronted (John Cassian). There is the very real danger that if we consort with erring brothers and sisters, we will be infected with their wrongdoing (Cyprian)." (Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture [digital version], IVPress)

In the ancient Greco-Roman Empire it was common for the poor to attach themselves to a wealthy patron who would feed them, sometimes in exchange for being mistreated and made the butt of jokes, at other times in exchange for serving their patron. But there were some poor who would simply flatter their patrons, going from one patron's luxuriously spread table to another patron's table. This latter case was so embedded in the culture that it became the subject of ancient comedies and training in rhetoric: such people were called "parasites." In the above Scripture passage, St Paul warns against such behavior that would bring the Christian community into ridicule. St. John Chrysostom was trained by a rhetorician who used such stories, and Chrysostom adopted it in some of his writings.

"In such a culture, the parasite effectively served to parody the lavish life – and especially the dinner habits – of the wealthy, people who could afford to have parasites at their tables as the evening entertainment. Chrysostom explicitly repudiates the mutual exploitation of the more affluent [who] pick out those persons whose laziness has made them victims of hunger, and maintain them as parasites and dogs feeding at the table: they stuff their shameless bellies with the leftovers of these iniquitous banquets and exploit their hosts at will." (Paul Blowers, "St. John Chrysostom on Social Parasites," http://academiccommons.columbia.edu/catalog/ac%3A138418, pp. 21-22)

As an aside, in today's culture wars the post-Christian and neo-pagan elements of our society often blame Christians for "hateful" attitudes toward the marginalized, especially LGBT people. In a Scripture passage similar to 2 Thes. ch. 3 above, St. Paul taught what the Christian viewpoint should be regarding these persons:

"7 Purge out the old yeast, that you may be a new lump, even as you are unleavened. For indeed Christ, our Passover, has been sacrificed in our place. 8 Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old yeast, neither with the yeast of malice and wickedness, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth. 9 I wrote to you in my letter to have no fellowship with sexual sinners; 10 yet not at all meaning with the sexual sinners of this world, or with the covetous and extortioners, or with idolaters; for then you would have to leave the world. 11 But as it is, I wrote to you not to have fellowship with anyone who is called a brother who is a sexual sinner, or covetous, or an idolater, or a slanderer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner. Don't even eat with such a person. 12 For what have I to do with also judging those who are outside? Don't you judge those who are within?" (1 Cor. 5:7-12)

By mentioning "Christ, our Passover" and "let us keep the feast" it is clear that St. Paul is referring to fellowship at the communion table, the early Church's "agape feast." He also uses the Greek word "pornos" that is translated here as "sexual sinners" and in this context refers to incest. But the root meaning of "pornos" is a male prostitute, that is, a homosexual. The Apostle Paul teaches here that sexual sinners, the covetous, extortioners, drunkards or idolaters should not be allowed to partake of communion (see his similar teaching in 1 Cor. 10), but he does not teach that Christians should judge or shun those in "the world" outside the Church. If we were to avoid contact with all sinners in the world, we "would have to leave the world," he wrote. The Christian sub-culture should be radically different than the surrounding world; however, we should not judge those outside the Church, but rather demonstrate Christ's love for the tax collectors and harlots – sexual sinners.

Thus we see that the Church is to be governed by Christ-like agape-love, a pure and holy, unselfish love for God and neighbor. That's why agape was translated as "charity" in the King James Version. Charity or philanthropy (phileo + anthropos = "brotherly love for humankind") is showing care and concern for others who are worse off than ourselves, regardless of whether they "deserve" our care or not. This was the radically new aspect of social ministry that Christianity brought to the Greco-Roman Empire. Part and parcel of this was the role of women in the philanthropy of the Byzantine Empire. in Part 1 we learned of the deaconess Olympias, a follower of St. John Chrysostom who gave all her wealth and her life to serve the poor, orphans, elderly, sick, widows and outcasts. He had to warn her to be wise about her giving, so that it would be directed to those in immediate distress and not squandered on professional beggars. We also learned in Part 1 about the wife of Emperor Justinian, Empress Theodora, who was herself a converted prostitute, built hospitals for the sick and dying, and the "Metanoia" home for wayward girls.

"And yet Olympias was not the only one who carried out the command of Christ. St. Makrina, sister of Basil the Great, St. Synklitike, Nikarete, Melania, ...Theophano, Irene, Xeni of John Comnenus and many other auspicious and even known women of Greek Christian Byzantium practiced great philanthropy.

"I must, however, add two more words about the well­loved Athenais, the non-Christian Athenian woman who became a Christian in Constantinople. Athenais was baptized taking the name Eudokia, became the finest prototype of harmony of Greek education and the Christian faith and a select example of a woman who used education, social position, wealth and service for people especially for the sick, the hungry, the unclothed, the poor and the neglected. Among the many philanthropic institutions that Athenais-­Eudokia established was a great poorhouse for 400 indigents. Constantinople, Antioch, and Jerusalem benefited from the philanthropic generosity of Athenais. Her example became an inspiration for other prominent queens and ladies of Christian Hellenism." (Demetrios Constantelos, "Women and Philanthropy in the History of Hellenism," http://intraweb.stockton.edu/eyos/arhu/content/docs/djc%20archive/Women%20and%20Philanthropy....pdf, p.4)

Another great resource on women's ministry in the church is Philanthropy and Social Compassion in the Eastern Orthodox Tradition edited by Matthew J. Pereira, 350 pages containing 22 articles devoted to philanthropy in the Orthodox Church past and present. There is simply not space or time here to delve into all of these articles. What happened to the role of women as deaconesses? Why did the philanthropy of the Byzantine Empire come to an end? Perhaps it was precisely because of the great works of charity begun by Olympas, Theodora, Eudokia and others which began as personal charitable work but were gradually taken over by the state. The earliest Christian teachings on this are from Christ Himself, from the Apostle Paul, and from the Apostolic Constitutions:

"15 Then the Pharisees went and took counsel how they might entrap him in his talk. 16 They sent their disciples to him, along with the Herodians, saying, 'Teacher, we know that you are honest, and teach the way of God in truth, no matter who you teach, for you aren't partial to anyone. 17 Tell us therefore, what do you think? Is it lawful to pay taxes to Caesar, or not?' 18 But Jesus perceived their wickedness, and said, 'Why do you test me, you hypocrites? 19 Show me the tax money.' They brought to him a denarius. 20 He asked them, 'Whose is this image and inscription?' 21 They said to him, 'Caesar's.' Then he said to them, 'Give therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's.' 22 When they heard it, they marveled, and left him, and went away." (Mat. 22:15-22)

The Early Church Father Severus wrote in his Cathedral Sermons, Homily 104: "Indeed, the act of giving tax to Caesar does not prevent the service of God, although you would like to think so. This is why it is necessary for you to give to God equally what is God’s, in such a manner that if what is Caesar’s is kept for the service of God, it is necessary that God be preferred to him. If you remain a tributary of Caesar, you should attribute this to your sins, not to God. In the same way, Paul similarly applies himself to the same distinction. In sending a letter to the Romans he wrote, 'Pay to the world, therefore, what is due to the world; to those you owe taxes, taxes; to those you owe tribute, tribute.'" (Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture [digital version], IVPress) From this it's clear that we must not make an either-or choice; instead it is both-and: some spheres of human activity should be paid for with taxes collected by the state, and other spheres should be funded by giving to God. But how exactly can we delineate these two spheres? St. Paul gives us the answer:

"1 Let every soul be in subjection to the higher authorities, for there is no authority except from God, and those who exist are ordained by God. 2 Therefore he who resists the authority, withstands the ordinance of God; and those who withstand will receive to themselves judgment. 3 For rulers are not a terror to the good work, but to the evil. Do you desire to have no fear of the authority? Do that which is good, and you will have praise from the same, 4 for he is a servant of God to you for good. But if you do that which is evil, be afraid, for he doesn't bear the sword in vain; for he is a minister of God, an avenger for wrath to him who does evil. 5 Therefore you need to be in subjection, not only because of the wrath, but also for conscience' sake. 6 For this reason you also pay taxes, for they are ministers of God's service, attending continually on this very thing. 7 Give therefore to everyone what you owe: taxes to whom taxes are due; customs to whom customs; respect to whom respect; honor to whom honor. 8 Owe no one anything, except to love one another; for he who loves his neighbor has fulfilled the law. 9 For the commandments, 'You shall not commit adultery,' 'You shall not murder,' 'You shall not steal,' 'You shall not give false testimony,' 'You shall not covet,' and whatever other commandments there are, are all summed up in this saying, namely, 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.' 10 Love doesn't harm a neighbor. Love therefore is the fulfillment of the law." (Rom. 13:1-10)

Here we see our obligation as Christians to pay taxes to earthly rulers because they "bear the sword" – they protect citizens from external enemies and internal criminals and evildoers (verses 1-7). These are the spheres of human activity that the state should provide for. But verses 8-10 describe the spheres of human activity which the Church should provide for: loving one another, teaching sexual morality, when it is wrong to take another human life, not to steal, lie or covet. These moral ideals must come from within: the state cannot force people to love their neighbors or the poor, sick or elderly – that often produces just the opposite of love – resentment. And how can the state prevent the inner desires of coveting, greed, jealousy, etc.? In fact, our consumer-oriented society promotes them!

The Apostles not only left us the New Testament, but also a collection of canons for governance of the Church called the "Constitutions of the Holy Apostles." St. John of Damascus, in his De Fide Orthodoxa: An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith, Book 4, Chapter 17, actually considered that work compiled in the early second century by Clement of Rome, a disciple of the Apostles, to be included in the New Testament. Other scholars date it from the 3rd or 4th centuries. But its ancient manuscript had been lost and was only rediscovered and translated from the "Ethiopic" (Coptic) language in the 1800s. It is a rich source of information on Church order the first century, for example:

"Canon XX. Concerning him who has been ordained through bribery. If there is a bishop or an elder or a deacon who has taken the grade of priest by bribery, let him be deposed. And let him who ordained him also be deposed and removed forever from the priestly office and let them not associate with him in any respect, just as I [Peter] removed Simon the Magician from me.

"Canon XXI. Concerning him who calls in aid that he may hold [office in] the Christian church. If a bishop obtains a position through the assistance of the princes of this world and rules the Christian church through them, let him be removed and deposed, he and all who follow him." (biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/jbl/1885_061.pdf

It goes on to delineate between the bishop's stewardship of church property and his own property in Canons XXX and XXXXI, priests forbidden to eat or drink in a public inn except in dire necessity when travelling, forbidden to ridicule the deaf, lame, blind or deformed, the hierarchy of metropolitans, bishops, priests and deacons, and much more. From these we see a definite order of worship and life, including ministry to the poor, lame, maimed and blind. But also we see that some bishops had yielded to the temptation of greed for wealth and power, so rules were adopted that forbade such sins, and the penalty was removal from office.

After Emperor Constantine made Christianity the official state religion of the Greco-Roman Empire, bishops often received not only offerings from believers for the Church's ministry to the poor, sick, widows, orphans and elderly; but also large sums of money from the government for these social ministries. Eventually, bishops occupied administrative positions similar to judge, mayor or governor, with all the honors and benefits that go with such positions, and their robes even today are derived from those of Byzantine government officials.

The book A History of Simony in the Christian Church details too many sad stories of buying church office and other corruption in the first eight centuries of the Church. And the death of Charlemagne in 814 AD was the zenith of the Byzantine Empire, after which the rise of Islam and its attacks on the Christian Greco-Roman Empire greatly diminished the borders of Byzantium, which eventually shrunk down to the fortress walls of Constantinople itself before that city fell to the Muslims. The Byzantine state was so encumbered by its social welfare programs that it could not properly fulfill its primary function to "bear the sword" and defend the populace.

From all this we can fairly conclude that when the Church becomes just another department of the state and receives enormous amounts of tax money for social welfare, it becomes a cumbersome bureaucracy that is nearly as subject to waste, greed and graft as any modern secular government agency. We can draw the lesson that charity and philanthropy should begin and end at home, in the local parish where Christians should have first-hand acquaintance with the people seeking help, and are able to offer the right kind of assistance that will not create dependency, but rather restore them to spiritual as well as physical wholeness.

An excellent article on how best to offer help to the needy is Do Christians practice too much ‘toxic charity’? by Fr. Dwight Longenecker. It is a summary of the book Toxic Charity by Robert Lupton, which I highly recommend.

I encourage you to read online Seek the Welfare of the City – Part 1. (Also available to download in PDF format at https://agape-biblia.org/literatura/#welfare) And enroll in our free courses to see how YOU can do diakonia-ministry!

  


 

Click on the "Share" buttons above TO SHARE THIS ESSAY with your friends, and click on Contact to WRITE YOUR COMMENTS.
Also, enroll in our free courses to see how YOU can do diakonia-ministry:

 


Here's our next free online course: (click →) Course 100 - "Rehabilitation of Children with Disabilities" - deadline to enroll: 2 October 2022 (← click) So enroll today, before you forget!


 


Keep our websites free! Support Agape Restoration Society via PayPal: click the "DONATE" button.
Also, please Share Our Vision with your family & friends.

And bookmark our Amazon Smile link to shop at Amazon!


 

NEXT, THE NEWS:

 


 

LILA ROSE DEBATES ABORTION ON THE DR. PHIL SHOW
from: LiveAction News

Lila Rose on Dr. Phil show (13 Sep.) Live Action President and Founder Lila Rose appeared on Dr. Phil on Monday to discuss life in America following the fall of Roe v. Wade. The episode covered multiple abortion-related topics but focused heavily on a couple from Louisiana that was recently refused an abortion for their baby who had been diagnosed with a life-threatening condition and was deemed likely to die at birth. Also appearing remotely was pro-life Louisiana Senator Katrina Jackson (D).

"Carry to Bury"

In August, at 10 weeks pregnant, Nancy Davis and her partner Shedric learned about their baby’s diagnosis of acrania. Doctors told them they should have an abortion, but then told them that they couldn't have the abortion in Louisiana because of a new pro-life law.

Ben Crump, a civil rights attorney representing the couple, told Dr. Phil, "Louisiana was one of the first states to institute draconian laws that said no matter what that situation is, a woman cannot choose to get an abortion even if the doctors told her that there was 99.9% chance that her baby would die in minutes after it came through her womb. And I understand, Dr. Phil, you’re a mental health expert. I cannot imagine the mental anguish of a woman that has to deliver a baby that she sees come out of her and then they pronounce it dead."

There are two clear problems with this statement. The first is that the Louisiana law does not prohibit abortion in the case of life-threatening fetal diagnoses. Senator Katrina Jackson, the author of the Louisiana law, told Dr. Phil that she wrote the bill without an exception but a medical futility exception was later added.

"When people say the Louisiana law forced this, it was not Louisiana law, it was overzealous physicians – and I respect them – who refused for three or four days to take the advice of the Lousiana Department of Health that the exception was in place," she explained. "So I’m not sure how much clearer it could be. The bill was written because we wanted to ensure there was no confusion." [read more...]

COMMENTARY: You can see in this video how the interviewer is trying to turn the audience away from the pro-life position by twisting the meaning of the new law in Louisiana. The law includes an exception for medical futility. Also, if a baby dies in utero, the removal of the deceased baby is not an abortion – this is another "whatabout" trick question that pro-abortion people will bring up, trying to say that pro-lifers are opposed to this procedure.

 


 

DARK CLOUD OVER CELEBRITY SURGEON IN NEW HAMPSHIRE
from: BioEdge.org

New England Heart Institute (13 Sep.) The award-winning Boston Globe Spotlight team of investigative reporters has targeted a New Hampshire cardiothoracic surgeon. In a series of articles, the Globe claims that Dr Yvon Baribeau had more settlements over surgical deaths than any other physician in the United States.

Dr Baribeau, who retired from his cardiothoracic surgery position at Catholic Medical Center (CMC) in Manchester in 2019 was widely known and esteemed. However, he had settled 21 medical malpractice suits at CMC, 14 of them allegedly over errors which led to a patient's death.

The Globe analysed the records of 125 current, retired, and non-practicing heart surgeons in Manchester’s best hospitals. It found that only 12 had any lawsuits and of those only two had two. Dr Baribeau’s track record was substantially worse.

The Globe also claimed that executives at CMC were aware of Dr Baribeau’s record. One doctor even lodged a federal whistle-blower case. However, Dr Baribeau was literally the face of CMC and appeared in a number of CMC advertisements. Through his attorney, Dr Baribeau told the Globe: "I performed over 10,000 procedures at CMC, always with patient safety as my first priority."

And CMC reacted angrily to the Globe’s allegations. "The story paints a picture of a hospital that is unrecognizable from the place we all know, and is based on allegations that we strongly refute," its CEO declared in a memo to staff. "And it overlooks the fact that thousands of people are only alive today because Dr. Baribeau operated on them." [read more...]

COMMENTARY: It is sad but true that hospitals will sometimes protect their own reputation and that of their top surgeons even when such a doctor has had many malpractice lawsuits against him. Doctors aren't infallible, they sometimes make mistakes. But they and their hospitals should be honest about it, not covering it up for the sake of protecting their reputation... and income.

 


 

CRIMEA: RELIGIOUS FREEDOM SURVEY, SEPTEMBER 2022
from: Forum 18 News Service

Crimea (22 Sep.) Freedom of religion and belief is, along with other human rights, severely restricted within the Russian-occupied Ukrainian territory of Crimea. Forum 18's survey analysis documents violations including: forced imposition of Russian laws and restrictions on exercising human rights, including freedom of religion or belief; jailing Muslim and Jehovah's Witness Crimean prisoners of conscience; forcible closure of places of worship; and fining people for leading meetings for worship without Russian state permission. All human rights including the freedom of religion and belief are severely restricted within the Russian-occupied Ukrainian territory of Crimea. Among the occupation forces' violations documented by Forum 18 are:

- forced imposition of Russian laws and restrictions on exercising human rights, including freedom of religion or belief;

- long-term jailings of Muslim and Jehovah's Witness Crimean prisoners of conscience for exercising their freedom of religion and belief since the 2014 Russian invasion;

- the forcible closure of places of worship;

- fining people for leading meetings for worship without Russian state permission;

- fining religious communities for failing to display their full Russian official legal name on places of worship, literature, and internet posts.

Members of a wide range of religious communities and others in Crimea are highly cautious about discussing anything that could be interpreted as criticism of the Russian occupation for fear of possible Russian state reprisals. This includes a reluctance to discuss the occupiers' violations of freedom of religion and belief.

The Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) has condemned Russian freedom of religion or belief and interlinked human rights violations in Crimea, including "the unlawful application of Russian Federation legislation by the occupation authorities of the Russian Federation in the occupied territory [Crimea]."

As Aleksandr Sedov of the now-banned Crimean Human Rights Group observed to Forum 18, punishments by Russian occupying forces for exercising the right to freedom of religion or belief violate, among other international human rights standards, the Geneva Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. [read more...]

COMMENTARY: Russia annexed Crimea in 2014 after holding a sham referendum. Now Russia is holding sham referenda in the territories it invaded this February and still controls through armed force, sending armed "poll workers" door-to-door collecting ballots and any "no" votes are duly recorded in a notebook: Armed Russian Proxies in Ukraine Pressure Locals to Vote on Annexation.

 


 

AS INSTITUTIONS CLOSE, FAMILIES OF LONGTIME RESIDENTS FACE AGONIZING CHOICES
from: Disability Scoop

Mike Lee (21 Sep.) Mike Lee’s way of life has faded away in most of the United States, and it soon will vanish from southwestern Iowa. Lee, 57, has spent 44 years at the Glenwood Resource Center, a state-run institution for people with intellectual or developmental disabilities.

He has autism and epilepsy, and his parents decided when he was 13 that he needed the structure and constant oversight offered by a large facility. Theirs was a common decision at the time. It no longer is.

The number of Americans living in such institutions has dropped more than 90% since the late 1960s. Seventeen states have closed all their large public institutions for people with disabilities. Just five states – Iowa, Nebraska, South Carolina, Utah and Wyoming – haven't closed any, according to a University of Minnesota expert.

Iowa announced in April that in 2024 it would shutter the Glenwood Resource Center, a sprawling campus near the state's western border. State leaders cited federal pressure to improve conditions for the facility's residents or place them elsewhere. Many of the remaining residents of such places have lived there for decades, leaving their families with wrenching choices when closures loom.

Lee knows he will move soon, even if he doesn't understand all the implications. His sister, Connie Bowen, broached the subject during a recent visit. She picked her brother up from the one-story house where he lives with several other residents on the institution's grounds and drove him to a nearby Pizza Hut for lunch.

As he sipped on a root beer, she asked how he felt. “Does it make you sad or happy that you're leaving?” she said. “Happy! I'm happy,” he replied. [read more...]

COMMENTARY: Shutting down group homes for people with intellectual disabilities is very similar to shutting down state-operated nursing homes with the reasoning that it is more efficient (saves money) for the recipients to live in the community or to pay for them to live with relatives. This has often shown to be detrimental to the recipients who then don't receive adequate care.

 


 

AFTER 7 MONTHS OF RUSSIA’S FULL-SCALE ATTACK: 270 RELIGIOUS SITES RUINED IN UKRAINE
from: Religious Information Service of Ukraine

270 religious sites ruined in Ukraine (21 Sep.) From February 24 to September 20, 2022, at least 270 religious sites in 14 regions of Ukraine were fully or partly ruined by the aggressive attack of the Russian Federation: churches, mosques, synagogues, educational and administrative building of Ukraine’s religious communities.

The noticeable increase in the number of damaged structures since the publication of the previous release is due to the fact that DESS (Department of Ethno-politics and Freedom of Consience) received detailed information about destroyed and damaged structures from the Religious Center of Jehovah’s Witnesses in Ukraine. DESS asks religious communities to send them information about buildings destroyed or damaged as a result of Russian military aggression.

The monitoring is conducted by the DESS in cooperation with the Workshop for the Academic Study of Religion. Visit our interactive map for geographical visualization of the affected sites and details regarding each of them. The full list of ruined sites of Ukraine’s religious communities is available in Ukrainian. Here is a summary:

5 of the 270 sites damaged by the Russian attack are Muslim, 5 Jewish, the other 260 Christian.

30 of the sites affected belong to various Protestant communities, 21 to the newly-autonomous Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU), 4 to the Roman Catholic Church, 3 to the Greek Catholic Church and 66 to the Jehovah’s Witnesses.

52% (136 sites) of all 260 Christian sites that got fully or partially ruined by the Russian attack belong to the Moscow Patriarchate's Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC). [read more...]

COMMENTARY: It is apalling that the Russian Orthodox Church's hierarchy continues to bless this invasion, war, and genocide in Ukraine, using the newly-reinvented false doctrine of "greater Rus" which is simply an excuse for committing the heresy of "ethnophylitism" – the dogma that one nationality is superior to others and thus has a right to conquer and rule over them.

 


 

WHAT LEGALIZED ABORTION BUILT: IT NORMALIZED PROMISCUITY, PROMOTED FATHERLESSNESS, AND VIEWED CHILDREN AS NON-HUMANS
from: Breakpoint.org

What abortion built (5 Aug.) As America adjusts to the Supreme Court's decision overturning Roe v. Wade, including by enacting more laws in some states to protect unborn children, a higher number of women will likely bring their babies safely to birth. This is good news, including for those in unexpected and crisis pregnancies. Not only will more at-risk babies be saved, more women will be spared the violence and false promises of abortion.

This will also mean that the efforts of pregnancy centers, adoption services, foster agencies, and other providers who generally care for struggling families must continue. In fact, by the grace of God, their work must increase. I have nothing but confidence that the Church is up to this task.

And yet, as a pro-life leader recently put it, these could be the hardest days for the pro-life movement to date. The oft-repeated charge that Christians must "redouble our efforts" to care for women in crisis pregnancies in the wake of the Dobbs decision presumes that women who feel unprepared, ill-equipped, scared, and abandoned to deal with crisis pregnancies on their own is a given part of life in America in 2022.

That should not be a given. It should be unacceptable to us.  In other words, the emergency before us isn't only that women are facing crisis pregnancies, and often facing them alone, but our culture's warped views of sex, marriage, children, and commitment. These bad ideas have set the stage for a world brimming with crisis pregnancies in the first place.

This is another subtle way legalized abortion has poisoned our cultural imagination. As Ryan Anderson and Alexandra DeSanctis demonstrate in their profound new book, Tearing Us Apart: How Abortion Harms Everything and Solves Nothing, legalizing abortion – which then normalized and destigmatized abortion culturally – rewired American thought so deeply that we don't even realize anymore when we're accepting demands that we could – and should – refuse.

Our work is not just to make abortion unthinkable. It is to make abandoning pregnant women unthinkable, to make derelict dads unthinkable, to make the fable of "sex without commitment" unthinkable. It is to re-catechize the world, and ourselves, about the true, un-severable relationship between marriage, sex, and babies.

Legalized abortion has blinded us to that core truth. In her book Rethinking Sex, Washington Post columnist Christine Emba describes how legalized abortion and even normalized contraception were sold to women as indispensable tools of their liberation. In fact, they made possible the widespread cultural acceptance of a lie: that sex and babies have nothing to do with one another.

However, rather than “liberate” women, it put more pressure on women to have sex without commitment and less pressure on men to commit. It allowed us to view and treat any children who result from sexual activity as unexpected and unwanted consequences, rather than human beings with rightful claims on our protection and commitments. [read more...]

COMMENTARY: Legalized abortion and legalized homosexual acts has resulted in normalizing these behaviors and normalizing the notion that any resistance to these new norms must be quashed: see Paypal Banned Anti-Pedo Group, While Pro-Pedo Group REMAINS On Platform.

 


 

NOW, OUR VIEWS:
 


 

JUDGMENT MUST BEGIN AT THE HOUSE OF GOD

 

 

Judgment Must Begin At The House Of God

"For the time has come for judgment to begin at the house of God.
If it begins first with us,
what will happen to those who don't obey the gospel of God?
If it is hard for the righteous to be saved,
what will happen to the ungodly and the sinner?"
(1 Peter 4:17-18)

From the section on St. Augustine on our Literature page, I quote: "Around A.D. 385, a certain young and ambitious teacher of public speaking named Augustine came to Milan to learn from Ambrose his oratorical technique, became a Christian and was baptized by Ambrose in A.D. 386. ... Saints Ambrose and Augustine both were proponents of priestly celibacy. Later, Emperor Justinian called the Quinisext Council (Trullo) in 692, in which the Canon XIII reaffirmed the Apostolic Tradition of married clergy, and it recognized that the Church in Rome was not observing Apostolic Tradition." So at least ever since the fourth century, there has been disagreement among Christian leaders concerning monastic and priestly celibacy. Enforcing celibacy for most religious workers has led to all sorts of scandals in the Church. In Matthew 19:10-12, when the Lord had been teaching about marriage and divorce, we read –

"His disciples said to Him, 'If this is the case of the man with his wife, it is not expedient to marry.' But He said to them, 'Not all men can receive this saying, but those to whom it is given. For there are eunuchs who were born that way from their mother's womb, and there are eunuchs who were made eunuchs by men; and there are eunuchs who made themselves eunuchs for the Kingdom of Heaven's sake. He who is able to receive it, let him receive it.'"

A eunuch is a man who for various reasons does not have sexual relations. As the Lord said, some are "born that way from their mother's womb" – this is not a justification for homosexuals to say they were just "born that way" in order claim a Scriptural basis for their homosexual lifestyle: a eunuch doesn't have any sexual relations. The point here is that celibacy is a valid lifestyle "for the Kingdom of Heaven's sake." It's not for everyone, though, only for those who are able to receive it. Those who cannot receive it should not take a vow of celibacy in the first place.

In 1 Corinthians ch. 7, St. Paul wrote about abstinence before marriage and faithfulness in marriage – "Now concerning the things about which you wrote to me: it is good for a man not to touch a woman. But, because of sexual immoralities, let each man have his own wife, and let each woman have her own husband" (verses 1-2). And later, in verse 24 – "Brothers, let each man, in whatever condition he was called, stay in that condition with God." This has been understood to mean that if a man is single when called into ministry, he should remain single, and if he is married, he should remain married to his spouse: divorce is not allowed for clergy. So priests are allowed to be married before they are ordained, but if they are single when ordained they should remain in that condition.

Why then are higher ranks of clergy such as bishops, archbishops, and patriarchs all celibate? First of all, this doesn't mean they have never been married, because a widowed priest can become a bishop: we know such a priest whose wife died and he was made a bishop. Second, this is a general rule, not an iron-clad law in the Church: we also knew a married Russian priest in Moscow who was elected to be a bishop because he was such a good priest. So there are exceptions to the rule. But if any celibate ordained clergyman wants to marry, he must renounce his vows and leave ordained ministry. Any celibate clergy who marries or has sexual relations outside of marriage must be "defrocked" – removed from the ordained ministry.

In my article SEEK THE WELFARE OF THE CITY, PART 2, you will read my comments on 1 Cor. 5:7-12 – "By mentioning "Christ, our Passover" and "let us keep the feast" it is clear that St. Paul is referring to fellowship at the communion table, the early Church's 'agape feast.' He also uses the Greek word "pornos" that is translated here as 'sexual sinners' and in this context refers to incest. But the root meaning of "pornos" is a male prostitute, that is, a homosexual. The Apostle Paul teaches here that sexual sinners, the covetous, extortioners, drunkards or idolaters should not be allowed to partake of communion" – i.e., be excommunicated, disfellowshipped. This applies especially to homosexual acts and extramarital affairs as more to be condemned than the other types of sin mentioned here.

Christ is the Head of the Church, and He expects the Church to discipline its members when it is necessary, and especially the leadership is not above discipline. They are to be an example to the flock, just as the Church is to be an example to the world:
      "Judgment Must Begin At The House Of God." May God have mercy on me too, a sinner!

(Get this as a separate article on our ARC-News blog at blogspot.com and share it!)

 


 

A big "Thank You!" is due to all of you who have been praying for Cheryl's full recovery from breaking her left femur on 18 April. She is walking without a cane most of the time now. Please continue praying that she will recover her normal gait. Thanks again!

 


 

Prayer and Praise:   For a daily reminder to pray for the items below, go to My Daily Prayer Guide and click on the "A-N pr." link!

Sun. – Pray that Christians will adopt a sensible, well-informed practice of caring for the poor and disabled.
Mon. – Thank the Lord for Dr. Phil interviewing Lila Rose and her strong defense of the pro-life position.
Tue. – Pray for hospitals to be honest and forthcoming about their doctors' mistakes, not covering them up.
Wed. – Ask God to restore unfavored religious groups' freedom of religion in Russian-controlled Ukraine.
Thu. – Pray for the people with disabilities whose group homes are being shut down for economic reasons.
Fri. – Intercede with God for an end to the destruction of church buildings all over war-ravaged Ukraine.
Sat. – Pray for God to make the idea of derelict dads and the fable of "sex without commitment" unthinkable.

 

Who Are We?   Please remember to pray for Christians in Secularized Countries, and for...

  Your fellow-servants,

  Bob & Cheryl

  p.s. Always keep your words soft and sweet, just in case you have to eat them.

 

 

This page may link to our Amazon and FastDomain.com affiliate accounts, so when you click on a link and buy something there, a small commission is credited to that account.